You can learn this Build a trading system Recognize trading, strive towards the right direction

Want to learn from thoughtful Didi

Reflections after 5 years of full-time trading Since resigning from a central SOE in April 2021 and now trading full-time, it has been a full five years. Since it's been five years, I think I should write something and leave something to keep. For these five years, I have given all my passion, time, and money. ------------------------------- My schoolmate and comrade said I played a good hand badly, that I had been a special forces soldier, and was the only person in our regiment who could join the Party after two years of service. After leaving the army, I returned to school and switched from our school's flagship major, architecture, to the tough civil engineering major. But when I graduated, I was one of two people admitted to a central enterprise through my own efforts. (Because when our major was recruited at our school, the central enterprise was already full. Two people were admitted: one was me, and the other was a classmate of mine. Reportedly, his family elder was a retired provincial cadre.) After graduating from university, he brought the aura of being a special forces soldier, a national flag honor guard, a provincial outstanding graduate, and scoring above 500 on the CET-4 and CET-6 English exams to enter a Fortune Global 500 central enterprise. At the company, I was highly valued by my boss because of my high emotional intelligence, good image, and solid cognition and logical thinking. If things had gone according to this script, I probably would have become a leader just like my schoolmate and comrade. --------------------------- But by a twist of fate, I ended up entering the narrow gateway of professional trading. At the beginning of 2021, after earning my first million-dollar fortune, I mistakenly saw trading as a career where you could succeed easily. Like most people, I was arrogant—earning 1.5 million on one deal and losing 2 million on another, and I remained calm, because I believed I was truly the chosen one, the god of trading. If this continued, even Buffett wouldn't care about me. In 2021, starting from the second half of the year, I started to lose steadily—hundreds of thousands, even hundreds of thousands. I went for a loss, then went for it; if I made a profit, I didn't exit, waiting until I lost before exiting. At the beginning of 2022, I started to panic. First, because I didn't have much money on hand and was about to run out; second, I realized that the technical indicators I had learned earlier seemed to be useless. 2022-2024 marked the start of my new trading career. In the second or third year, I started constantly writing review notes. Although it may seem childish now, I think this was the first step in my change. It wasn't until the end of 2024 that I finally woke up and realized that the MA, MACD, and other technical indicators I had painstakingly reviewed before were useless and all wrong. But at this point, I was just skeptical, step by step testing my new understanding. On the winter solstice of 25 years, I truly attained enlightenment. Because I'm very confident that short-term contract trading doesn't rely on technical indicators, but on volume-price and structural breakthroughs. In 2025, I achieved this twice: using $200 in 20 days to make $40,000, a 200x return. This gave me a lot of confidence. I just suddenly realized that my spiritual guide in trading, the otaku Bitcoin, said in 2021 that trading is not related to principal and correctness. But why do you make gains and then lose them back? First, because of financial pressure in real life, and second, because you can't control your actions. Up to now, I've been working hard to overcome these two issues. When cognition reaches the correct dimension, the unity of knowledge and action is effective. If all perceptions are wrong, then execution is one, just adding mistakes upon mistakes. After saying so much, what I want to tell everyone is that trading ultimately follows a volume-price structure. Don't waste your energy searching for the trading holy grail or all kinds of bluffy technical indicators. My trading has really come full circle and come back again. If there's a breakout, I chase; if I fake a breakout, I cut my losses. It's really that simple. I don't know how far I can go on this path, but as long as I can keep going, I will keep moving forward with determination.

New Weibo: Trader Haihai MAX

High-definition cropped version Trade in your spare time Let's enjoy the gossip together

$170—-$462 mark it $USELESS

$USELESS made a breakout went long with a stop loss

Weibo accounts with the same name were banned Three Weibos with 46K followers, 87K followers, and 11K followers were banned one after another I won't use Weibo anymore

Was Waller even more hawkish than Powell? A rate hike in September is really coming back! Waller's debut speech at Jackson Hole really had some substance. Institutional language model analysis shows that Waller's speech this time is more hawkish than Powell's in recent years. And this is no coincidence—it aligns completely with his recent press conferences, meeting minutes, and congressional testimonies. What did Waller say? Inflation is still too high, the economy remains resilient, and the financial environment is far from "restrictive." His exact words were: the underlying trend of inflation "has not shown meaningful improvement," and the Fed "still has work to do." The 2% inflation target is "firm and unchangeable." Even more intense, he directly said, "What I stand for today is discipline, not a decision"—not even giving forward guidance! The market exploded after hearing this, with the probability of a September rate hike soaring from 35% to nearly 60%. Gold plunged $50, and U.S. Treasury yields rose. Honestly, Waller's "quiet Fed" approach is much tougher than Powell's hardcore style back then. If there really is a rate hike in September, BTC and altcoins will be under pressure again

$TURBO Isn't this the exact same fake breakout structure as $LIGHT? But one is on the 5-minute and 15-minute levels, and the other is on the 15-minute and 1-hour levels.

$LIGHT made a mistake Did not trust the eyes, respected objective facts Instead believed the mind, supervisor intervened, imagined Here it is very obvious that a false breakout structure occurred